Reduce duplicate project administration
Carry site assumptions, drawing revisions and quantities into schedules, trade packages and claims reviews. Teams spend less time copying records and reconciling versions.
Replaice solutions
See what a project change affects before it reaches site.
BiltFlow is Replaice’s construction AI platform for feasibility, drawing review, quantity takeoff, procurement, project scheduling, claims and reporting.
What you can do
- Extract quantities from drawings and prepare a bill of quantities (BOQ).
- Connect costing and procurement packages with the project schedule.
- Use NorthStar to link drone and robotic inspection observations to project records.
Related platforms
Level 03 drawingRev B → Rev C · Partition change
- QuantityPartition length increases by 12 m.BOQ Engine · Level 03 partitions
- PackageUpdate the drywall package scope for review.ProcureFlow · Tender package PKG-07
- MilestoneCheck whether the additional work affects the fit-out start.Pulse · Level 03 fit-out
Replaice in practice
Where Replaice adds value
Make changes visible across delivery
Use Pulse milestones, Vault revisions and ResourceFlow forecasts to see how a scope change affects procurement dates and crew capacity.
Keep commercial decisions traceable
Review bids against a consistent scope and compare subcontractor claims with awarded rates and prior certifications. Keep award and payment approvals with authorised staff.
BiltFlow lifecycle
From site feasibility to subcontractor payment.
Follow the project records that connect planning, design coordination, procurement and delivery.
- 01SiteScope
Scope the site
Compare feasibility scenarios and capture site constraints.
HandoffFeasibility assumptions and site constraints
- 02Pulse
Plan the program
Build the baseline schedule with phases, dependencies and milestones.
HandoffMilestones and required-on-site dates
- 03Vault
Coordinate drawings and documents
Create project records and drawing registers. Upload, review, revise and share drawings and documents with controlled access.
HandoffReviewed drawing revisions and scope documents
- 04BOQ Engine & Estimator
Quantify and price the scope
Extract quantities from drawings and apply trade rates to build the bill of quantities.
HandoffQuantities and cost breakdown for trade packages
- 05ProcureFlow
Tender and award
Build packages, issue RFQs, compare bids and award subcontractor contracts.
HandoffAwarded contract, scope and agreed rates
- 06PayFlow
Assess claims and manage payment
Review progress claims against awarded scope, contract terms and program milestones. Certify approved amounts for payment.
Payment recordCertified amounts and payment status
Illustrative case study · Australia
A major contractor consolidates its project technology.
This model represents a large Australian contractor running multiple projects. The figures are planning assumptions for a hypothetical rollout.
Annual technology budget
Amounts in AUD. The model assumes overlapping tools are retired after rollout.
| Cost category | Before | After |
|---|---|---|
| Software subscriptions | A$1.40m | A$1.00m |
| Integrations and maintenance | A$600k | A$430k |
| External technical support | A$400k | A$250k |
| Total | A$2.40m | A$1.68m |
The model excludes one-off migration and training costs. Administrative capacity is tracked separately from the technology savings.
How agents reduce manual effort
- Drawing changes. Flag changes for quantity and schedule review. 1,200 reviews × 3 hours saved = 3,600 hours.
- Procurement packages. Draft scopes from approved quantities and flag gaps in bids. 900 packages × 2 hours saved = 1,800 hours.
- Subcontractor claims. Check rates and prior claims and route discrepancies to the reviewer. 1,300 claims × 2 hours saved = 2,600 hours.
That is about 4.4 full-time equivalents of capacity at 1,800 productive hours per year. Project teams retain approval of awards and payments and can redirect that time to delivery and exception handling.